Development of Multimedia-Based E-Learning Models in Distance Learning Concepts

Nourma Islam Dewi Cantika; Hanafi Dana Bastian

doi:10.35671/jmtt.v4i1.87

Authors

Nourma Islam Dewi Cantika Universitas Amikom Purwokerto https://orcid.org/0009-0006-1182-4584
Hanafi Dana Bastian Universitas Amikom Purwokerto https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1759-9315

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35671/jmtt.v4i1.87

Keywords:

Multimedia, Blended Learning,, Elearning,, Effectifvity,

Abstract

Learning content is the most important thing in the teaching and learning process. In the distance learning model, content must receive important attention, because in distance learning, students get material with a greater proportion of reading content independently than face to face with the tutor. Moreover, currently the type of learning can be said to be developing with the help of information technology. The problem lies in the type of each person in implementing learning styles. Not everyone has a type as an active reader. The application of multimedia to distance learning content will help students absorb more learning materials. The method used is blended learning which combines conventional concepts with information technology to change the concept of learning to be more interactive. This is proven by the increase in learning outcomes of students who study using the blended learning concept using multimedia compared to those who study independently. In the current situation, namely the era of personalized learning, multimedia plays a very important role in the implementation of teaching and learning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Nourma Islam Dewi Cantika, Universitas Amikom Purwokerto

Student of Information System, Faculty of Computer Science, Universitas Amikom Purwokerto

Hanafi Dana Bastian, Universitas Amikom Purwokerto

Student of Informatic Departement, Faculty of Computer Science, Universitas Amikom Purwokerto

References

T. Chatziemmanouil and C. Katsanos, “Accessibility Academy: Interactive Learning of the WCAG 2.1 Web Accessibility Guidelines,” in 2024 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 2024, pp. 1–7.

Y. Akgül, “Evaluating the performance of websites from a public value, usability, and readability perspectives: a review of Turkish national government websites,” Univers. Access Inf. Soc., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 975–990, 2024.

M. Torabi and C. H. Bélanger, “Influence of online reviews on student satisfaction seen through a service quality model,” J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res., vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 3063–3077, 2021, doi: 10.3390/jtaer16070167.

M. Ullah, “Content analysis of medical college library websites in Pakistan indicates necessary improvements,” Heal. Inf. & Libr. J., vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 16–25, 2024.

S. Batool, J. Rashid, M. W. Nisar, J. Kim, H.-Y. Kwon, and A. Hussain, “Educational data mining to predict students’ academic performance: A survey study,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 905–971, 2023.

K. Coussement, M. Phan, A. De Caigny, D. F. Benoit, and A. Raes, “Predicting student dropout in subscription-based online learning environments: The beneficial impact of the logit leaf model,” Decis. Support Syst., vol. 135, p. 113325, 2020.

I. Önder and A. Berbekova, “Web analytics: more than website performance evaluation?,” Int. J. Tour. Cities, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 603–615, 2022.

T. D. Vila, E. A. González, N. Araújo Vila, and J. A. Fraiz Brea, “Indicators of website features in the user experience of e-tourism search and metasearch engines,” J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 18–36, 2021.

B. C. Shia, M. Chen, and A. D. Ramdansyah, “Measuring customer satisfaction toward localization website by WebQual and importance performance analysis (case study on AliexPress Site in Indonesia),” Am. J. Ind. Bus. Manag., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 117–128, 2016.

I. Santiko and G. Andriana, “Assessing the Accuracy Level of University-Based Website-Based Search Engines Using F-Measure and Hellinger,” vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 689–700, 2024, doi: 10.51519/journalisi.v6i2.716.

T. L. Andersen, S. Kristensen, B. W. Nielsen, and K. Grønbæk, “Designing an augmented reality board game with children: the battleboard 3D experience,” in Proceedings of the 2004 conference on Interaction design and children: building a community, 2004, pp. 137–138.

O. López-Vargas, M. Bermúdez-Martínez, and L. Sanabria-Rodríguez, “Self-Efficacy and Learning Achievement in Students with Different Cognitive Styles in a Video Game ,” Rev. Colomb. Educ., vol. 1, no. 85, pp. 55–78, 2022, doi: 10.17227/rce.num85-12499.

M. Dabbous et al., “The Role of Game-Based Learning in Experiential Education: Tool Validation, Motivation Assessment, and Outcomes Evaluation among a Sample of Pharmacy Students,” Educ. Sci., vol. 12, no. 7, 2022, doi: 10.3390/educsci12070434.

M. Korkiakoski, A. Antila, J. Annamaa, S. Sheikhi, P. Alavesa, and P. Kostakos, “Hack the Room: Exploring the potential of an augmented reality game for teaching cyber security,” Center for Ubiquitous Computing, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland: Association for Computing Machinery, 2023, pp. 349–353. doi: 10.1145/3582700.3583955.

A. Theodoropoulos and G. Lepouras, “Game Design, Gender and Personalities in Programming Education,” Front. Comput. Sci., vol. 4, 2022, doi: 10.3389/fcomp.2022.824995.

J. Fernandes, “The Game of Words Human Creative Writing Against Computer Assisted Writing,” vol. 320. Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH, ISCAP/P.PORTO/CEOS.PP, NOVA|CLUNL, São Mamede de Infesta, Portugal, pp. 625–631, 2023. doi: 10.1007/978-981-19-6585-2_55.

J. Shen, H. Yang, J. Li, and Z. Cheng, “Assessing learning engagement based on facial expression recognition in MOOC’s scenario,” Multimed. Syst., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 469–478, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s00530-021-00854-x.

A. Iglesias Rodríguez, B. García Riaza, and M. C. Sánchez Gómez, “Collaborative learning and mobile devices: An educational experience in Primary Education,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 72, pp. 664–677, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.019.

A. F. Alkhwaldi, “Understanding learners’ intention toward Metaverse in higher education institutions from a developing country perspective: UTAUT and ISS integrated model,” Kybernetes, 2023.

W. H. Wong and E. Chapman, “Student satisfaction and interaction in higher education,” High. Educ., vol. 85, no. 5, pp. 957–978, 2023.

S. Salloum et al., “Sustainability model for the continuous intention to use metaverse technology in higher education: a case study from Oman,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 6, p. 5257, 2023.

Y. Qiu, R. Isusi-Fagoaga, and A. Garcia-Aracil, “Perceptions and use of metaverse in higher education: A descriptive study in China and Spain,” Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell., vol. 5, p. 100185, 2023.