User Interface Design for Discrepancy-Simple Additive Weighting Evaluation Instrument

I Made Sugiarta; Wayan Sugandini; Made Susi Lissia Andayani; P. Wayan Arta Suyas

doi:10.35671/jmtt.v4i3.105

Authors

I Made Sugiarta Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
Wayan Sugandini Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
Made Susi Lissia Andayani Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
P. Wayan Arta Suyas Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35671/jmtt.v4i3.105

Keywords:

Design UI, Discrepancy, DSS, SAW, Evaluation, Instrument

Abstract

In an effort to make it easier for users to understand how DSS-based instruments function without having to run the actual application, a user interface design is required. The purpose of this study was to show the quality of the user interface design of the Discrepancy-SAW evaluation instrument. The research approach used the R&D development model, which focuses on three stages of development. The three stages were design creation, initial design trial, and revision of the initial design trial. The subjects involved in the initial trial of the user interface design were 40 respondents. The trial tool was a questionnaire consisting of 10 questions related to the user interface design. Analysis of the trial data was carried out by comparing the percentage of user interface design quality with quality standards that refer to the eleven-scale categorization. The results of this study show the quality of the user interface design of the Discrepancy-SAW evaluation instrument in the good quality category by a quality percentage of 83.38%. The impact of the results of this study is that stakeholders in the field of education gain knowledge about the existence of the user interface design of the Discrepancy-SAW evaluation instrument. It is appropriate for use in determining the dominant factors that trigger inequality in the lecture process in the research methodology course.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

B. K. Daniel, “The role of research methodology in enhancing postgraduate students research experience,” The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 34–48, 2021.

F. Rustomo, F. B. Annishia, and R. Ramadhina, “Evaluation of study of research methodology courses,” Jurnal Ilmiah Mandala Education (JIME), Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 1582–1586, 2022.

N. Jampel, I. W. Lasmawan, I. M. Ardana, I. P. W. Ariawan, I. M. Sugiarta, and D. G. H. Divayana, “Evaluation of learning programs and computer certification at course institute in Bali using CSE-UCLA based on SAW simulation model,” Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, Vol. 95, No. 24, pp. 6934–6949, 2017.

Pakaya, and T. Machmud, “The development of geogebra-assisted mathematics learning media on geometry of space flat-side of cubes and blocks,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Vol. 1968, pp. 1–5, 2021.

L. Qadriah, M. B. A. Wicaksono, S. Somadiyono, and H. Nindiasari, “CIPP model as a mathematics learning evaluation model in elementary school,” International Journal of Science and Society, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 435–444, 2022.

Kamid, J. Marzal, Syaiful, Y. Remalisa, and R. K. Dewi, “The effect of the LAPS-heuristic learning model on students’ problem solving abilities,” Journal of Educational Science and Technology, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 9–17, 2021.

Mursidin, “The discrepancy evaluation model in the cultivation of responsibility character at Madrasah Aliyah Negeri Insan Cendekia Sambas,” Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Science and Islamic Studies, Vol. 1, pp. 1156–1166, 2023.

E. Faridah, I. Kasih, S. Nugroho, and T. Aji, “The effectiveness of blended learning model on rhythmic activity courses based on complementary work patterns,” International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 918–934, 2022.

I. Santiko, A. Wibowo, and B. Warsito, “The Post-Covid-19 Pandemic Education Model Is Effective, Let’s Compare: Online Versus Offline Learning,” Proc. - 2021 Int. Semin. Appl. Technol. Inf. Commun. IT Oppor. Creat. Digit. Innov. Commun. within Glob. Pandemic, iSemantic 2021, pp. 212–216, 2021, doi: 10.1109/iSemantic52711.2021.9573238.

Z. A. Hasibuan and H. B. Santoso, “The use of E-learning towards new learning paradigm: Case study student centered E-learning environment at Faculty of Computer Science University of Indonesia,” Proc. - 5th IEEE Int. Conf. Adv. Learn. Technol. ICALT 2005, vol. 2005, pp. 1026–1030, 2005, doi: 10.1109/ICALT.2005.279.

M. Urh, G. Vukovic, E. Jereb, and R. Pintar, “The Model for Introduction of Gamification into E-learning in Higher Education,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 197, no. February, pp. 388–397, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.154.

Wulandari, A. Widiastuti, Nasiwan, J. Setiawan, M. R. Fadli, and Hadisaputra, “Development of learning models for inculcatingpancasila values,” International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 1364–1374, 2023.

L. Naibaho, “Online learning evaluation during covid-19 using cse-ucla evaluation model at english education department universitas kristen indonesia,” Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal), Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 1987–1997, 2021.

C. Timbi-Sisalima, M. Sánchez-Gordón, J. R. Hilera-Gonzalez, and S. Otón-Tortosa, “Quality assurance in e-learning: A proposal from accessibility to sustainability,” Sustainability, Vol. 14, No. 5, pp. 1–27, 2022.

J. McGowan, B. Attal, I. Kuhn, L. Hinton, T. Draycott, G. P. Martin, and M. Dixon-Woods, “Quality and reporting of large-scale improvement programmes: A review of maternity initiatives in the english NHS, 2010–2023,” BMJ Quality & Safety, Vol. 2023, No. 1, pp. 1–12, 2023.

F. S. Cakir, and Z, “Adiguzel analysis of leader effectiveness in organization and knowledge sharing behavior on employees and organization,” SAGE Open, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 1–14, 2020.

B. Suratno, and J. Shafira, “Development of user interface/user experience using design thinking approach for GMS service company,” Journal of Information Systems and Informatics, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 469–494, 2022.

C. Zhou, F. Yuan, T. Huang, Y. Zhang, and J. Kaner, “The impact of interface design element features on task performance in older adults: Evidence from eye-tracking and eeg signals,” International Journal Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol. 19, No. 15, pp. 1–24, 2022.

Y. K. Dwivedi, E. Ismagilova, D. L. Hughes, J. Carlson, R. Filieri, J. Jacobson, V. Jain, H. Karjaluoto, H. Kefi, A. S. Krishen, V. Kumar, M. M. Rahman, R. Raman, P. A. Rauschnabel, J. Rowley, J. Salo, G. A. Tran, and Y. Wang, “Setting the future of digital and social media marketing research: Perspectives and research propositions,” International Journal of Information Management, Vol. 59, pp. 1–37, 2021.

Anastacia, M. Purbasari, and V. J. Basiroen, “User interface (UI) design as a visual communication medium for composting waste management education,” Indonesian Journal of Visual Culture, Design, and Cinema, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 38–54, 2022.

Dewiyanti, A. M. Puspasari, F. S. A. Kamil, and B. K. Ningtyas, “Exploratory study of visual enhancement to display smart apps on android phones for Selasar Imaji library,” International Journal of Design, Vol. 1, pp. 17–26, 2021.

T. Oktavia, Meyliana, H. Prabowo, R. Kosala, and S. H. Supangkat, “A conceptual social learning ontology for higher education in e-learning 2.0,” Proc. 2016 Int. Conf. Inf. Manag. Technol. ICIMTech 2016, no. November, pp. 165–170, 2017, doi: 10.1109/ICIMTech.2016.7930323.

F. Alonso, D. Manrique, L. Martinez, and J. M. Vines, “How blended learning reduces underachievement in higher education: An experience in teaching computer sciences,” IEEE Trans. Educ., vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 471–478, 2011, doi: 10.1109/TE.2010.2083665.

L. Dessart. C. Veloutsou. and A. Morgan-Thomas. "Consumer engagement in online brand communities: A social media perspective." J. Prod. Brand Manag.. vol. 24. no. 1. pp. 28–42. 2015.

D. Chaffey and F. Ellis-Chadwick. Digital Marketing: Strategy. Implementation. and Practice. 7th ed. Pearson. 2019.